Israel’s army said Monday that if an Israeli soldier fired the shot that killed Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, it did not appear that the soldier was guilty of criminal misconduct.
“Given that Ms. Abu Akleh was killed in the midst of an active combat zone, there can be no immediate suspicion of criminal activity absent further evidence,” said a statement citing Military Advocate Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi.
Tomer-Yerushalmi will ultimately be responsible for determining whether any individual soldier will face disciplinary action over the fatal May 11 shooting during clashes in the occupied West Bank flashpoint of Jenin.
She stressed that Israel does not yet know whether Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American, was killed by stray Palestinian gunfire or by an Israeli bullet aimed at a Palestinian militant.
The army “is taking every effort to examine the circumstances of the incident in order to understand how Ms Abu Akleh was killed,” the statement said.
Qatar-based Al Jazeera has accused Israel of killing Abu Akleh “deliberately” and “in cold blood”.
Tomer-Yerushalmi restated Israel’s request to examine the bullet extracted from the body of the reporter. The projectile is in the Palestinian Authority’s custody.
“The inability to inspect the bullet, which is being held by the Palestinian Authority, continues to cast doubt on the circumstances of Ms Abu Akleh’s death,” the statement said.
The army has said it had zeroed in on one incident where an Israeli soldier using “a telescopic scope” fired at a “Palestinian gunman”.
That gunman “was near” to Abu Akleh, the army has said, adding that it wants to compare the bullet with the weapon fired in this incident.
Israel has offered to conduct the ballistic examination with Palestinian and American experts present.
By procedure, Tomer-Yerushalmi decides on next steps in the military probe based on the initial findings, known as a commander’s inquiry.
“A final decision as to whether a criminal investigation will be launched will only be made after further facts from the (army’s) operational investigation and other sources are available,” the statement said.
